首页> 外文OA文献 >Two new types of assays to determine protein concentrations in biological fluids using mass spectrometry of intact proteins with cystatin C in spinal fluid as an example
【2h】

Two new types of assays to determine protein concentrations in biological fluids using mass spectrometry of intact proteins with cystatin C in spinal fluid as an example

机译:两种新型分析方法,以脊髓液中胱抑素C的完整蛋白质质谱分析法测定生物体液中的蛋白质浓度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is no reference method that is generally acknowledged to be unbiased for the determination of the concentration of any protein in biological fluids. This is probably because mass spectrometry (MS) methods acknowledged as reference methods for determination of low molecular mass substances in biological fluids, e.g. creatinine, have been difficult to adapt for proteins. Here we suggest two tentative MS methods, which might be used as reference methods for the determination of protein concentrations in biological fluids. One is based upon the addition to the fluid of a non-proteome reference protein, very similar to the one to be measured, and analyzing the ratio between the corresponding peaks in a selected ion monitoring (SIM) chromatogram. We call this method LC-MS-NPRP (NPRP, Non-Proteome Reference Protein). The other method is based upon the classical standard addition assay for low molecular mass substances. The results of these assays for cystatin C in spinal fluid were compared to those obtained by an immunoassay. Both methods indicated lower concentration than the immunoassay. This was found to be due to the presence of a significant fraction of monohydroxylated cystatin C in spinal fluid. It turned out that the sum of the unhydroxylated and hydroxylated cystatin C concentrations, determined by either of the two MS methods, were close to the results obtained by the immunoassay. These MS-based methods analyze intact proteins and therefore seem more suitable for the determination of protein concentrations in biological fluids than other MS-based methods requiring proteolytic degradation with its inherent lack of precision.
机译:没有公认的参考方法可用于确定生物液中任何蛋白质的浓度。这可能是因为质谱(MS)方法被公认为是测定生物流体中低分子量物质的参考方法,例如肌酐很难适应蛋白质。在这里,我们建议使用两种试验性MS方法,它们可以用作确定生物体液中蛋白质浓度的参考方法。一种是基于将与待测蛋白质非常相似的非蛋白质组参考蛋白质添加到液体中,然后在选定的离子监控(SIM)色谱图中分析相应峰之间的比率。我们称此方法为LC-MS-NPRP(NPRP,非蛋白质组参考蛋白)。另一种方法是基于经典的低分子量物质标准加法测定方法。将这些针对脊髓液中胱抑素C的测定结果与通过免疫测定获得的结果进行了比较。两种方法均指示浓度低于免疫测定法。发现这是由于脊髓液中存在很大比例的单羟基化胱抑素C。事实证明,通过两种质谱方法中的任何一种测定的未羟基化和羟基化的胱抑素C浓度之和与通过免疫测定获得的结果相近。这些基于MS的方法分析了完整的蛋白质,因此比其他需要蛋白水解降解的基于MS的方法(固有的缺乏精确性)似乎更适合于测定生物流体中的蛋白质浓度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号